Entitlement theory of Justice
Entitlement Theory of Justice
The entitlement theory of justice, developed by Robert Nozick in his book Anarchy, State and Utopia (1974), offers a libertarian perspective on distributive justice. Nozick challenges redistributive theories of justice by defending minimal state interference.
The entitlement theory of justice provides a framework for understanding justice regarding
the legitimate acquisition, transfer, and rectification of holdings.
Principles
of entitlement theory -
- Justice in Acquisition -
Nozick suggests that individuals can claim ownership over previously
unowned things if they appropriate them without worsening the condition
of others.
- Justice in Transfer - Nozick
emphasizes on the legitimacy of the ownership of transferred property. He
says the legitimacy of ownership depends on whether past transfers
followed just transfer. He does not emphasize on the distribution of wealth.
- Justice in Rectification - Nozick acknowledges that real-world distributions are often tainted by historical injustices, requiring appropriate correction.
Nozick invokes moral principles to demolish a
redistributive, welfare state. He defends the idea of a minimal state. He
approves taxation only for the provision of common services, like streets
and street lights, police, and defense.
According to Nozick, any distribution that arises from just acquisitions and transfers is just, regardless of how unequal it may be.
Criticism -
- Extreme
disparities can threaten social cohesion and fairness.
- While
he acknowledges the need to correct historical injustices, his concept of
justice through rectification is ambiguous.
- While
his whole focus is on property rights, he neglects on the individual's
access to basic resources that would constitute freedom to pursue life
goals.
Nozick's entitlement theory of justice offers a robust
defense of individual rights, voluntary exchanges, and a minimal state.
Comments
Post a Comment